Self Invalidating Assignment

1. Cano A, Barterian JA, Heller JB. Empathic and nonempathic interaction in chronic pain couples. Clinical Journal of Pain. 2008;24(8):678–684.[PMC free article][PubMed]

2. Cano A, Leong L, Heller JB, Lutz JR. Perceived entitlement to pain-related support and pain catastrophizing: Associations with perceived and observed support. Pain. 2009;147(1–3):249–254.[PMC free article][PubMed]

3. Cano A, Leong LEM, Williams AM, May DKK, Lutz JR. Correlates and consequences of the disclosure of pain-related distress to one’s spouse. Pain. 2012;147:249–254.[PMC free article][PubMed]

4. Cano A, Williams ACD. Social interaction in pain: Reinforcing pain behaviors or building intimacy? Pain. 2010;149:9–11.[PMC free article][PubMed]

5. Fordyce WE. Behavioral methods for chronic pain and illness. 1976

6. Fruzzetti A, Shenk C. Fostering validating respones in families. Social work in mental health. 2008;6(1–2):215–227.

7. Fruzzetti AE. Validation and Invalidation Coding System. 2001

8. Hadjistravropolos T, Craig KD, Duck S, Cano A, Goubert L, Jackson PL, Mogil JS, Rainville P, Sullivan MJL, de C Williams AC, Vervoort T, Fitzgerald TD. A biopsychosocial formulation of pain communication. Psychological Bulletin. 2011 Advanced online publication. [PubMed]

9. Kool MB, van Middendorp H, Borije HR, Geenen R. Understanding the lack of understanding: Invalidating from the perspective of the patient with fibromyalgia. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2009;61(12):1650–1656.[PubMed]

10. Laurenceau JP, Barrett LF, Pietromonaco PR. Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;74:1238–1251.[PubMed]

11. Laurenceau JP, Barrett LF, Rovine MJ. The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology. 2005;19(2):314–323.[PubMed]

12. Linehan M. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press; 1993.

13. Linehan M. Validation and psychotherapy. In: Bohart A, Greenber LS, editors. Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 1997.

14. Linton SJ, Boersma K, Vangronsveld KLH, Fruzzetti AE. Painfully reassuring? The effects of validation on emotions and adherence in a pain test. European Journal of Pain. 2011;16:592–599.[PubMed]

15. Reis HT. The role of initmacy in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 1990;9(1):15–30.

16. Reis HT, Patrick BC. Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In: Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW, editors. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1996.

17. Reis HT, Shaver P. Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In: Duck S, editor. Handbook of personal relationships. Chicester: Wiley; 1988.

18. Rhudy JL, Meagher MW. The role of emotion in pain modulation. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 2001;14:241–245.

19. Rhudy JL, Williams AM, McCabe KM, Russell JL, Maynard LJ. Emotional control of nociceptive reactions (ECON): Do affective valence and arousal play a role? Pain. 2008;136:250–261.[PubMed]

20. Roy M, Lebuis A, Peretz I, Rainville P. The modulation of pain by attention and emotion: A dissociation of perceptual and spinal nociceptive processes. European Journal of Pain. 2011;15[PubMed]

21. Vangronsveld KLH, Linton SJ. The effect of validating and invalidating communication on satisfaction, pain and affect in nurses suffering from low back pain during a semi-structured interview. European Journal of Pain. 2011 in press. [PubMed]

22. White B, Sanders SH. The influence on patients’ pain intensity ratings of antecedent reinforcement of pain talk or well talk. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 1986;17(3):155–159.[PubMed]

23. Zelman DC, Howland EW, Nichols SN, Cleeland CS. The effects of induced mood on laboratory pain. Pain. 1991;46(1):105–111.[PubMed]

Validation means to express understanding and acceptance of another person's internal experience, whatever that might be. Validation does not mean you agree or approve. Validation builds relationships and helps ease upset feelings. Knowing that you are understood and that your emotions and thoughts are accepted by others is powerful. Validation is like relationship glue. 

Self-validation is accepting your own internal experience, your thoughts and feelings. Self-validation doesn't mean that you believe your thoughts or think your feelings are justified. There are many times that you will have thoughts that surprise you or that don't reflect your values or what you know is true. You will also have feelings that you know aren't justfied. If you fight the thoughts and feelings, or judge yourself for having them, then you increase your emotional upset. You'll also miss out on important information about who you are as a person.

Validating your thoughts and emotions will help you calm yourself and manage your emotions more effectively. Validating yourself will help you accept and better understand yourself, which leads to a stronger identity and better skills at managing intense emotions. Self-validation helps you find wisdom.

Learning to self-validate is not so easy. How do you apply the six levels of validation to self-validation? Notice that mindfulness and self-validation go hand in hand. Being mindful of the thoughts you are having and the feelings you are experiencing is necessary before you can validate that internal experience. 

Marsha Linehan defined six levels of validation. These levels can also be applied to self-validation.

Level 1 Be Present 

To be mindful of your emotions without pushing them away is consistent with Linehan’s first level of validation:  Being Present. To be present also means to ground yourself and not dissociate, daydream, suppress or numb your emotions. Being present means listening to yourself. Feeling the pain of sadness, hurt, and fear is challenging and difficult. At the same time avoiding emotions often results in quite negative consequences, while accepting allows emotions to pass and helps build resiliency. Being present for yourself validates that you matter and that you have the strength to feel. Being present with your internal experience means you experience the body sensations that are part of your emotional experience. 

Level 2 Accurate Reflection

Reflect means to make manifest or apparent. For self-validation, accurate reflection is acknowledging your internal state to yourself and labelling it accurately. Perhaps you reflect on what triggered the emotion and when the precipitating event ocurred. Maybe you reflect on the ways you feel the emotion in your body and consider the actions that go with the emotion. Reflecting means observing and describing, components of mindfulness as LInehan defines it. When you observe and describe your internal experience, you do not interpret or guess or make assumptions. You would say, “I feel angry and it started yesterday after my friend cancelled lunch. I sense tightness in my stomach, so maybe there is fear as well.”

Saying, “I am a total loser and no one wants to spend any time with me,” would not be stating the facts of your experience. Stating the facts of your experience is validating and helps build trust in your internal experience. Interpreting your experience in ways that you cannot observe to be true invalidates and leads to distrust in your internal experience and more 

Level 3: Guessing

 Sometimes you won’t be sure what you are feeling or thinking. In these situations you may want to say something like, “If someone else were in this situation they would probably feel sad. Am I sad?” You might also guess by looking at the actions you want to do. If you want to hide, maybe you are feeling shame. Maybe you are thinking shame thoughts. You can notice where you feel body sensations, such as fear is often felt in the throat. If you are feeling fear, maybe you are thinking scary thoughts. Guessing your emotions and thoughts based on the information you have will help you learn more about yourself. 

Level 4: Validating by History

 Sometimes you will have thoughts and feelings that are based on events that have happened in your past. Maybe you are afraid when people argue because in the past arguments led to your being hurt. Validating yourself by saying, “It’s acceptable and understandable that you are afraid of arguments because when you were young, your parents would hurt each other during arguments."

 Level 5: Normalizing

Sometimes people who have intense emotions don’t see any of their emotional reactions as being normal. Everyone has emotions. No one is happy all the time.  It’s normal to feel sad, angry, hurt, ashamed, or any other emotion. At the same time, it’s just as important to validate when others would feel the same way and accept that as well. If you are sad because you didn’t get a job you wanted, remember that others would be sad if that happened to them. Check out whether what you are feeling is what most other people would experience and validate those feelings as normal, even if you don't like experiencing them.

 Level 6: Radical Genuineness

 In terms of self-validation, this means being your real self and not lying to yourself. It means that you don’t pretend to be someone you aren’t. Rejecting who you are is one of the highest levels of invalidation. An important distinction is that who you are is different from what you do. You are not your behavior, yet changing some of your behaviors may alleviate some of your suffering.

 Self-validation is one of the critical steps for living with intense emotions. It is part of forming relationships and thriving. Practice and more practice will help you self-validate more easily.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *